<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for With eyes wide open.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>A conquest of the mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:07:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Max Beckman by לפעמים שווה לראות מה תלוי במסדרון</title>
		<link>http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/max-beckman/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>לפעמים שווה לראות מה תלוי במסדרון</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/?p=147#comment-66</guid>
		<description>[...] מקס בקמן &#8211; 1920, הסבר ומקור מכאן  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] מקס בקמן &#8211; 1920, הסבר ומקור מכאן  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Antonio Lopez Garcia by rafa</title>
		<link>http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/antonio-lopez-garcia/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>rafa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/?p=105#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Thank you, vey good information!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, vey good information!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rembrandt van Rijn by museum-tracker</title>
		<link>http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/rembrandt-van-rijn/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>museum-tracker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-57</guid>
		<description>BTW 15 July (1606) is Rembrandt&#039;s birthday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW 15 July (1606) is Rembrandt&#8217;s birthday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Liáng Kăi by Ernst Ludwig Kirchner &#171; With eyes wide open.</title>
		<link>http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/liang-kai/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernst Ludwig Kirchner &#171; With eyes wide open.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-54</guid>
		<description>[...] a profound impact on Kirchner in order for him to paint them all as a subject.  It reminds me of Liang Kai in that Kirchner paints his group in the style which would come to symbolize Expressionism, as Kai [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a profound impact on Kirchner in order for him to paint them all as a subject.  It reminds me of Liang Kai in that Kirchner paints his group in the style which would come to symbolize Expressionism, as Kai [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fairfield Porter by Aletha</title>
		<link>http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/2008/05/17/fairfield-porter/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Aletha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 02:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-52</guid>
		<description>&quot;Abstraction&quot; has always played a central role in making pictures because to depict anything you have to take it apart -- rendering it as color, line, form, etc.  The image can&#039;t just jump on the canvas.  The artist notices qualities of the object in some order.  At any stage before the picture is complete, it looks &quot;abstract&quot; in some degree.  Even very &quot;realistic&quot; drawings are &quot;abstract&quot; in the elimination of color.  All art, however persuasive, is abstract in some way:  pictures by being flat, sculpture by being frozen, any image by having bounderies created by the frame, etc.
The perceptional qualities of actual, real things can seem &quot;abstract&quot; too if you remove the context that allows you to identify them.  So, for instance, various kinds of scientific photos look &quot;abstract,&quot; i.e., like patterns of just color,etc.  Things that are not visible to the naked eye are by definition &quot;abstract.&quot;
Porter was a traditional artist during a phase when the trends were against him.  That he persisted shows how much he believed in what he did.  I&#039;m also quite sure he had a genuine interest in abstraction, but abstraction is so much a development &quot;of&quot; representation.  In the way we use the word today, &quot;abstraction&quot; derives from artists like Matisse who decided that the first sketch had a compelling beauty equal to that of many &quot;finished&quot; works.
Meanwhile as to the abstract painters of the generation of Porter, it&#039;s not as though they are exempt from the reevaluations of art that take place in every era.  Certain artists of the period who were the &quot;it&quot; artists of their generation are not so well known now, and their reputations continue to decline.
I&#039;m was really glad to see you writing about Porter.  He&#039;s a very underestimated artist.  He&#039;s due for rediscovery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Abstraction&#8221; has always played a central role in making pictures because to depict anything you have to take it apart &#8212; rendering it as color, line, form, etc.  The image can&#8217;t just jump on the canvas.  The artist notices qualities of the object in some order.  At any stage before the picture is complete, it looks &#8220;abstract&#8221; in some degree.  Even very &#8220;realistic&#8221; drawings are &#8220;abstract&#8221; in the elimination of color.  All art, however persuasive, is abstract in some way:  pictures by being flat, sculpture by being frozen, any image by having bounderies created by the frame, etc.<br />
The perceptional qualities of actual, real things can seem &#8220;abstract&#8221; too if you remove the context that allows you to identify them.  So, for instance, various kinds of scientific photos look &#8220;abstract,&#8221; i.e., like patterns of just color,etc.  Things that are not visible to the naked eye are by definition &#8220;abstract.&#8221;<br />
Porter was a traditional artist during a phase when the trends were against him.  That he persisted shows how much he believed in what he did.  I&#8217;m also quite sure he had a genuine interest in abstraction, but abstraction is so much a development &#8220;of&#8221; representation.  In the way we use the word today, &#8220;abstraction&#8221; derives from artists like Matisse who decided that the first sketch had a compelling beauty equal to that of many &#8220;finished&#8221; works.<br />
Meanwhile as to the abstract painters of the generation of Porter, it&#8217;s not as though they are exempt from the reevaluations of art that take place in every era.  Certain artists of the period who were the &#8220;it&#8221; artists of their generation are not so well known now, and their reputations continue to decline.<br />
I&#8217;m was really glad to see you writing about Porter.  He&#8217;s a very underestimated artist.  He&#8217;s due for rediscovery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Susan Hauptman by susan hauptman</title>
		<link>http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/2008/04/27/susan-hauptman/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>susan hauptman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/?p=63#comment-51</guid>
		<description>[...] in general.? A professor of mine once proclaimed that art should always be interesting, personal ...http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/2008/04/27/susan-hauptman/Susan HauptmanThe Georgia Museum of Art will present susan Hauptman, from November 23, 1339, to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in general.? A professor of mine once proclaimed that art should always be interesting, personal &#8230;http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/2008/04/27/susan-hauptman/Susan HauptmanThe Georgia Museum of Art will present susan Hauptman, from November 23, 1339, to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Odilon Redon by Julie</title>
		<link>http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/odilon-redon/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 17:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/?p=98#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Very Interesting Scott. You have a great writing style. I have never heard of Odilon Redon. Thanks for bringing this artist to my attention.
Julie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very Interesting Scott. You have a great writing style. I have never heard of Odilon Redon. Thanks for bringing this artist to my attention.<br />
Julie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nicolas De Stael by malefic</title>
		<link>http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/2008/05/21/nicolas-de-stael/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>malefic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/?p=93#comment-35</guid>
		<description>malefic says : I absolutely agree with this !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>malefic says : I absolutely agree with this !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nicolas De Stael by sprintsport</title>
		<link>http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/2008/05/21/nicolas-de-stael/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>sprintsport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/?p=93#comment-30</guid>
		<description>A fellow Edinboro student, interesting.  Yes, the painting program was rigorous. The faculty pushed a lot of formal theory, and how conceptual issues relate to those ideas.  I suppose that some of the teaching however, catered to the individual needs of the student.  Nicolas De Stael is a great painter, a friend showed me some of his work while I was beginning to take painting classes.  I think his work has had some influence on me.  I appreciate the comment about the blog!  I am working hard on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fellow Edinboro student, interesting.  Yes, the painting program was rigorous. The faculty pushed a lot of formal theory, and how conceptual issues relate to those ideas.  I suppose that some of the teaching however, catered to the individual needs of the student.  Nicolas De Stael is a great painter, a friend showed me some of his work while I was beginning to take painting classes.  I think his work has had some influence on me.  I appreciate the comment about the blog!  I am working hard on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Peter Doig by Julie</title>
		<link>http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/peter-doig/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witheyeswideopen.wordpress.com/?p=81#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Thanks. Shame to have missed it, but I bet I am missing some incredible exhibitions over where you are.
J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. Shame to have missed it, but I bet I am missing some incredible exhibitions over where you are.<br />
J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
